Feedback - BAVS
- Berget-events
- Berget Crew & Site Admin
- Posts: 1981
- Joined: 30 Jan 2006, 21:22
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Feedback - BAVS
Please give us your feedback on the BAVS, and how it can be improved.
Berget-events
Please send general questions to:
info@berget-events.com
Please send payment questions to:
payment@berget-events.com
Please send general questions to:
info@berget-events.com
Please send payment questions to:
payment@berget-events.com
Re: Feedback - BAVS
Too few AT4s, make more!
6mm.se
B9: UN - Platoon commander
B10: Zansian Black Guards - Platoon commander
B11: Ravens - Company commander/Intel officer
B12: Ravens - 2 in Command
B13: Ikaros - 2iC
B15: Mercs - 2iC
B17: GFM - 2iC
B18: GFM - 2iC
B9: UN - Platoon commander
B10: Zansian Black Guards - Platoon commander
B11: Ravens - Company commander/Intel officer
B12: Ravens - 2 in Command
B13: Ikaros - 2iC
B15: Mercs - 2iC
B17: GFM - 2iC
B18: GFM - 2iC
Re: Feedback - BAVS
When the vehicle is destroyed the red Bavs-light could be toggled on. This would make it easier to identify a destroyed vehicle.
Re: Feedback - BAVS
The BAVS system is still one of my favourite systems for vehicle play. But they are to powerfull. Not the BAVS itself but the amount of shots you can take without having to go back for a reload.
I undertand that balancing this tool is not easy. Making sure the mech has fun but also make sure the AT guys have fun.
By making the AT4 a bit less powerfull will make sure that it's a more important role and not just, here take an AT4 and keep shooting.
Besides that, I hate the full closed turrets. As infantry you can't do anything about them. Except rushing them until you are in their MED so they can't shoot anymore. By having 1 side open there is a chance to shoot the gunner and get closer to the vehicle. Level 1, only 1 frone shield, level 3 & 5, 3 sides covered.
Also I wanted to note that the vehicle registration system was not the best. At the last night a Blue car came in that was excactly the same as one of our cars. That was a level 3 and ours was a level 1. The only difference was the fully closed turret while ours had 3 sides and camonetting. Besides that there were Wranglers that were level 3 while our big Polish armoured vehicle was also a 3. A pre game vehicle check can easily fix the queue or questions on site. The term 'armoured' is sometimes uses to the bear minimum to follow the rules. Again, I know that some lines need to be used but now the lines were a bit fluid.
I undertand that balancing this tool is not easy. Making sure the mech has fun but also make sure the AT guys have fun.
By making the AT4 a bit less powerfull will make sure that it's a more important role and not just, here take an AT4 and keep shooting.
Besides that, I hate the full closed turrets. As infantry you can't do anything about them. Except rushing them until you are in their MED so they can't shoot anymore. By having 1 side open there is a chance to shoot the gunner and get closer to the vehicle. Level 1, only 1 frone shield, level 3 & 5, 3 sides covered.
Also I wanted to note that the vehicle registration system was not the best. At the last night a Blue car came in that was excactly the same as one of our cars. That was a level 3 and ours was a level 1. The only difference was the fully closed turret while ours had 3 sides and camonetting. Besides that there were Wranglers that were level 3 while our big Polish armoured vehicle was also a 3. A pre game vehicle check can easily fix the queue or questions on site. The term 'armoured' is sometimes uses to the bear minimum to follow the rules. Again, I know that some lines need to be used but now the lines were a bit fluid.
Re: Feedback - BAVS
The BAVS are indeed a bit OP.
Longer reload times, maybe a flash of light so a 'rocket launch' doesn't stay overly sneaky, maybe a sound module, ...
It's too easy to shoot 'a rocket' at a vehicle without being noticed, which makes a proper response far more difficult.
Also, like Verage said, fully enclosed turrets are a pain. SMall arms should - eventually - be able to take out a turret gunner.
Whether it's by small gaps, thin-walled turrets covers, or an impact counter,... options exist.
Longer reload times, maybe a flash of light so a 'rocket launch' doesn't stay overly sneaky, maybe a sound module, ...
It's too easy to shoot 'a rocket' at a vehicle without being noticed, which makes a proper response far more difficult.
Also, like Verage said, fully enclosed turrets are a pain. SMall arms should - eventually - be able to take out a turret gunner.
Whether it's by small gaps, thin-walled turrets covers, or an impact counter,... options exist.
B6: NATO
B7: Orlov Corp
B8: Poldavian III Mntrs
B9: Poldavian III Mntrs
BX: Poldavian BRF
BXI: Blood Raven Recon
BXII: Blood Raven CO
BXIII: Cerberus BAT CO
BXIV: UPIR Senior Management
BXV: UPIR HQ resident cripple
BXVI: UPIR old fart
BXVII: GFM HQ
BXVIII: GFM HQ
B7: Orlov Corp
B8: Poldavian III Mntrs
B9: Poldavian III Mntrs
BX: Poldavian BRF
BXI: Blood Raven Recon
BXII: Blood Raven CO
BXIII: Cerberus BAT CO
BXIV: UPIR Senior Management
BXV: UPIR HQ resident cripple
BXVI: UPIR old fart
BXVII: GFM HQ
BXVIII: GFM HQ
Re: Feedback - BAVS
I wanna second this feedback. This would be really great
B12/ Orlvov Mercs/ Echo/ Robin-3
B13/ GCT Inf/ 3rd Pl.
B14/ NAF Inf/ Echo-1
B15/ UPIR HWD
B16/ NAF Mech/ Golf-3
B17/ TFC Mech/ Golf-40
I like big BAVS and I cannot lie...
B13/ GCT Inf/ 3rd Pl.
B14/ NAF Inf/ Echo-1
B15/ UPIR HWD
B16/ NAF Mech/ Golf-3
B17/ TFC Mech/ Golf-40
I like big BAVS and I cannot lie...