Search found 5 matches

by Ming the Merciless
02 Jul 2008, 13:18
Forum: Berget 6
Topic: The game area
Replies: 60
Views: 78587

As quoted many many times by commanders and Berget admin THIS WAS NOT A MILSIM. And yes i don't mind walking 4 hours except a lot of the time we walked 4 hours to objectives that weren't there anymore. :twisted:
by Ming the Merciless
02 Jul 2008, 13:17
Forum: Berget 6
Topic: Results?
Replies: 46
Views: 62239

I think the comments on the fact that a winner doesn't need to be declared is testament to the chaos that was the organisation throughout the event. Surely the organisers had a planned story with an overall objective in mind otherwise you may as well have done away with the virus/missiles/chips and ...
by Ming the Merciless
02 Jul 2008, 13:10
Forum: Berget 6
Topic: *** NATO feedback thread ***
Replies: 87
Views: 109824

There were some cheating issues. Nato were renowned throughout our camp for not taking hits. We also had encounter range issues with 3 of our members being shot by Nato troops repeatedly at close range with an M249 even though they were wearing their wounded flags, almost ending in a fight. We got t...
by Ming the Merciless
02 Jul 2008, 13:00
Forum: Berget 6
Topic: ****Gen Conrad?s Mercs Feedback Thread****
Replies: 54
Views: 72594

To be honest, i came out of Berget very 50/50. There were some good moments but our team only saw 1-2 hours of action per day despite being up at 9am till 3am. There was so much wasted time and so many order changes, i can remember waking up at 8am for a special mission and the mission changing so m...
by Ming the Merciless
02 Jul 2008, 12:24
Forum: Berget 6
Topic: The game area
Replies: 60
Views: 78587

I'm not sure what happended with you guys but the amount of times we have to hike for 4/5 hours to get to an objective was silly. Of the 6 days we were playing we had at most one hours worth of actual encounters per day, the rest hiking. I'd say make the site smaller and get people doing what they s...