I'm curious how many people would drop out simply because of needing a new uniform. Compared to the overall costs of attending Berget it's not the largest chunk of cash by far. Not speaking from a theoretical point of view here. I already had US woodland but went and got DPM to fit with the rest of...

Hell yeah, where can I join up!?!?

When playing without armbands, sides should just to have different camos and not a collection of all WL / Desert camos. We have played quite large games without armbands, when sides had something like "OD vs. DPM" or "WL vs. Flektarn", and it really works. Even with armbands, you should check your t...

Well, looking at the poll, it sure does seem to be that DENIED is the word.

... I would not accept radio listening unless there is clearly most of people accepting that, like at least 70%.
Never the less, I don't see any reason why this would make my b9 any worse

Maybe answer to this could be that: Field troop PMR radios could be listenend, but jamming should be denied. Then commander level radios (LA?) should be considered as "better encrypted" so it couldn't be listened or jammed either. So, if somebody on field talks about secret stuff in radio, he/she sh...

2 Saveli_M: please consider splitting the second option into two - listening+jamming is allowed or only listening is allowed but no jamming, since this will really make people crazy. Well, I cannot do that anymore (cannot edit poll anymore), but let's say that if some people does consider "listenin...

Come on people! Vote if you have not done it yet

Most of us does think that spamming/jamming other side radio frequencies is really, really annoying and bad behavior. IRL military radios can use encryption etc. to keep radio channels open and secure, but because of most of civilian radios cannot do that, flooding channels, spying and other things ...

How about setting up a poll about this matter?
Two options:
1 - Listening enemy channels is ok to get intel.
2 - No to anykind of spying from radios

...I guess we all do agree that spammin' is so freaking annoying, that we can prohibit that by rules? agreed?

Cuby wrote:

Saveli_M wrote:IF they survive alive

Is it possible to survive dead?

Oh wait. Is that what you could call a zombie?

Well, it's possible to survive injured...
Get it?
...But let's just stay focused on the topic, allright?

TriXon wrote:True true.

You can maybe call that suicide bombers(?) who are not sure if they wants to do it or not?

Well, They got probably couple of months longer respawn time IF they survive alive

If for example a tank tries to attack my home base, and I'm a engineer. I can sneak to a side of the tank, and walk/run @ the same speed the tank is moving while applying C4 on the side, which may be a bit dangerous if the tank is in movement... The answer will be found in 'rules' section. You MAY ...

Don't worry, you can always be a fair-play:er and just load your clips with no more than 90bb's, but you'll have to put a blue tape-stripe to your clips wich will tell that your magazines are larger than accepted in rules. ..But remember, you can load MAX 90bb's in, NOT 92 or 139! Of course this is ...

http://www.arniesairsoft.co.uk/?filnavn ... s_calc.htm
there's one, next time use google first

I dont know if its the same story (we were near Old drilling site) but my platoon stopped one Armored car with the human attack (as you say) once because there was no way to stop the car. I havent read in the rules that you cant stop a car by staying on the road. My suggestion: How about using norm...