Page 1 of 3

Feedback: Missions

Posted: 30 Jun 2018, 18:26
by Arradin
Let us know What you think about the missions you recieved this year!

Re: Feedback: Missions

Posted: 02 Jul 2018, 00:36
by victor1w
NAF bravo company/ rangers.
We were told to roam by ower selfe, with a general area of operation. whitch worked and was realy appreciated.
The ranger specific missions(hit and run, sabotage etc) where greate.

But there were a few missions, where we had to do infantry tasks(becouse they were not to the task, or not awake. Aparently(rumours)). Whitch was pritty booring/undervelming. but all in all, pritty good.

Re: Feedback: Missions

Posted: 02 Jul 2018, 14:45
by Simb4
I do not know if these missions are from Berget or from command but no more missions to take out the Merc forces inside the village.

It is not a place you want 200-300 extra people. It is tight around the tents and there is a lot of personal gear and tents.

Please make some kind of FAD-point close to the village also so the fighting is around but not in the village.

Got this mission as NAF last year and as UPIR this year.
It is not a good mission and people get annoyed and angry when people trip on tent lines etc.

Re: Feedback: Missions

Posted: 03 Jul 2018, 19:55
by jdoe
Simb4 wrote:
02 Jul 2018, 14:45
I do not know if these missions are from Berget or from command but no more missions to take out the Merc forces inside the village.

It is not a place you want 200-300 extra people. It is tight around the tents and there is a lot of personal gear and tents.

Please make some kind of FAD-point close to the village also so the fighting is around but not in the village.

Got this mission as NAF last year and as UPIR this year.
It is not a good mission and people get annoyed and angry when people trip on tent lines etc.
Totally agreed.

Re: Feedback: Missions

Posted: 03 Jul 2018, 21:30
by Arradin
It is a reoccuring issue, that will be adressed before next game.

A base can not also be an objective.

Re: Feedback: Missions

Posted: 03 Jul 2018, 22:13
by igariokas
Simb4 wrote:
02 Jul 2018, 14:45
I do not know if these missions are from Berget or from command but no more missions to take out the Merc forces inside the village.

It is not a place you want 200-300 extra people. It is tight around the tents and there is a lot of personal gear and tents.

Please make some kind of FAD-point close to the village also so the fighting is around but not in the village.

Got this mission as NAF last year and as UPIR this year.
It is not a good mission and people get annoyed and angry when people trip on tent lines etc.
as far as I know there was no ingame point to storm Merc village, there was no cp inside and no value to take out the village ingame. But maybe gm could comment

Re: Feedback: Missions

Posted: 03 Jul 2018, 23:09
by Arradin
It was not a mission from BE

Re: Feedback: Missions

Posted: 03 Jul 2018, 23:21
by L4gi
From UPIR oporder:
Get the Mercenaries back under your control by diplomacy, bribery ​OR​ by removing and changing their leadership to someone UPIR Friendly. ( This can only be done by arranging an public election within the mercenary organization. NOTE: More information on how to rig an election will be given on site )
We tried the first two, didnt work. The big raid we did was HQ sanctioned as we tried to complete it via the third option. As always there were too many moving pieces(wedding, The Firm, etc.) which ultimately ended in it just being a bloodbath. We tried to leave the village but Mercs respawned and started shooting at reds again so the people around engaged back. After that it was mostly rogue groups engaging into town.

Re: Feedback: Missions

Posted: 04 Jul 2018, 07:57
by Windi^
What missions? Go push a button and wait... Conquest! CTF! Berget please try to try again really.

Re: Feedback: Missions

Posted: 04 Jul 2018, 08:14
by Xray
We where missing the story and there was not enough missions.

Many of the missions was go to x , capture it and hold it.
We where missing some more history , why we take them and hold them.

But Berget need to make many more missions. And not only capture and hold missions.

Re: Feedback: Missions

Posted: 04 Jul 2018, 14:19
by jdoe
L4gi wrote:
03 Jul 2018, 23:21
From UPIR oporder:
Get the Mercenaries back under your control by diplomacy, bribery ​OR​ by removing and changing their leadership to someone UPIR Friendly. ( This can only be done by arranging an public election within the mercenary organization. NOTE: More information on how to rig an election will be given on site )
We tried the first two, didnt work. The big raid we did was HQ sanctioned as we tried to complete it via the third option. As always there were too many moving pieces(wedding, The Firm, etc.) which ultimately ended in it just being a bloodbath. We tried to leave the village but Mercs respawned and started shooting at reds again so the people around engaged back. After that it was mostly rogue groups engaging into town.
Umm... how did The Firm contribute to the bloodbath?

Re: Feedback: Missions

Posted: 04 Jul 2018, 14:50
by L4gi
By screwing up our plans elsewhere on the map, that were linked directly to the change in leadership. Its a big picture thing, not just some small "bloodbath"

Re: Feedback: Missions

Posted: 04 Jul 2018, 15:01
by jdoe
L4gi wrote:
04 Jul 2018, 14:50
By screwing up our plans elsewhere on the map, that were linked directly to the change in leadership. Its a big picture thing, not just some small "bloodbath"
:D Okay. Didn't realize 13 guys could do that...

Re: Feedback: Missions

Posted: 04 Jul 2018, 15:10
by Sweeper
I dont know were to put this Complain but here it comes.



I asked Berget Event, and a Berget Trustee a simple Question. About the BB Weight. Do to the INFO slip handed out at check in Last year, and the Info on the Berget Website wasent the same...

NONE of you returned my Question, is that good "customer" service? when it lacking on the Berget side. An can have an effect for my game and others.


But all in all, great Berget Game.

Re: Feedback: Missions

Posted: 04 Jul 2018, 15:15
by L4gi
jdoe wrote:
04 Jul 2018, 15:01
L4gi wrote:
04 Jul 2018, 14:50
By screwing up our plans elsewhere on the map, that were linked directly to the change in leadership. Its a big picture thing, not just some small "bloodbath"
:D Okay. Didn't realize 13 guys could do that...
Shouldnt be like that, but somehow you managed. :D